Home Blog stories for the network age

stories for the network age

14 min read
0
1
48
stories for the network age

The TIMN mannequin [Tribes + Institutions + Markets + Networks] developed by David Ronfeldt has influenced a lot of my very own work in taking a look at how we’re shifting toward a network society and should create organizational varieties which might be beyond national governments and beyond markets. Even combining the efforts of civil society, governments, and markets won’t be sufficient to deal with our best challenges — local weather change and environmental degradation.

These have been my assumptions to this point.

  1. The three organizing varieties for society, chronologically — Tribes, Institutions (Governments), Markets — are broadly relevant throughout historical past.
  2. Each kind builds on the different and adjustments it.
  3. The final kind is the dominant kind — at the moment that will be the Market kind (witness the rising pandemic-induced recession and its affect on nationwide governance)
  4. A brand new kind is rising — Networks (Commons)‚ and therefore the T+I+M+N mannequin.
  5. This kind has additionally been referred to as the noosphere.
  6. I’ve discovered proof that what initiated every new kind was a change in human communication media — T+I (written phrase), T+I+M (print), T+I+M+N (electrical/digital).
  7. I consider we’re at the moment in between a triform (T+I+M) and a quadriform (T+I+M+N) society, which accounts for a lot of the present political turmoil in our post-modern world.
  8. This mannequin can assist inform us tips on how to build better organizational forms for a coming age of entanglement.

David Ronfeldt and John Arquilla have lately revealed an replace of their unique 1999 work on the ‘Noosphere’ — Whose Story Wins: Rise of the Noosphere, Noopolitik, and Information-Age Statecraft.

The authors broaden on a lot of the concepts they first proposed in a 1999 RAND Corporation report titled The Emergence of Noopolitik: Toward an American Information Strategy, wherein they described the emergence of a brand new globe-circling realm: the noosphere. First, Earth developed a geosphere, or a geological mantle; second, a biosphere, consisting of plant and animal life. Third to develop shall be Earth’s noosphere, a worldwide “thinking circuit” and “realm of the mind” upheld by the digital info revolution. As the noosphere expands, it’ll profoundly have an effect on statecraft—the situations for conventional realpolitik methods will erode, and the prospects for noopolitik methods will develop. Thus, the decisive consider at the moment’s and tomorrow’s wars of concepts is sure to be “whose story wins”— the essence of noopolitik. To enhance prospects for the noosphere and noopolitik, U.S. coverage and technique ought to, amongst different initiatives, deal with the world commons as a pivotal challenge space, uphold “guarded openness” as a tenet, and institute a brand new requirement for periodic evaluations of the U.S. “information posture.”

What is the Noosphere?

It goes past civil society, authorities, and markets. It has a planetary perspective. The Noosphere is a worldwide narrative, therefore the title — Whose Story Wins — which may be developed by way of Noopolitik, together with “worldwide ‘special media forces’ that may very well be dispatched into battle zones to assist settle disputes by way of the discovery and dissemination of correct narratives and for functions of rumor management“. We certain may use a few of that proper now.

The noosphere favors upholding moral and ecumenical values that search concord and goodwill, freedom and justice, pluralism and democracy, and a collective spirit harmonized with individuality. It is an anti-war and pro-environment idea. Strategically, it implies pondering and appearing in world or planetary methods whereas minding long-range ends and the creation of latest modes of company to form issues in any respect ranges. It implies humanity coming collectively by way of all kinds of cognitive, cultural, and different shut encounters. It is about the coevolution of the planet and humanity—thus, it implies understanding the nature of social and cultural evolution much better than theorists have up up to now. And it means participating non-state, in addition to state, actors in a quest to create a brand new (post-Westphalian) mannequin of world order that’s much less tethered to the nation-state as the sole organizing precept and focus of loyalty. Furthermore, the noosphere favors the widespread positioning of sensory applied sciences and the creation of sensory organizations for planetary and humanitarian monitoring functions. —Ronfeldt & Arquilla

The idea of a Noosphere is sort of a century outdated and the authors describe its historical past from the starting — “… coined by French theologian-paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, French mathematician Édouard Le Roy, and visiting Russian geochemist Vladimir Vernadsky after they met collectively in Paris in 1922” —  to the previous few many years the place it has been picked up by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Kevin Kelly, Michel Bauwens, and lots of others.

The authors clearly differentiate Noopolitik and Realpolitik, the latter which has dominated worldwide affairs for over a century.“Noopolitik is a present-day alternative to realpolitik, but, in addition, it represents an evolutionary step beyond it. As mentioned earlier, realpolitik was originally an industrial-age concept; noopolitik is a postindustrial, information-age concept. Realpolitik is a concept from the past; noopolitik is a concept for the future.”  Noopolitik is concentrated on sharing energy, not projecting it towards others.

Where are we now?

The authors state that the USA has deserted any progress towards a Noosphere and that its darker sides have been allowed to manifest, in America and past. These darkish sides have many names — “information warfare, information operations, cognitive warfare, political warfare, memetic warfare, epistemic warfare, neocortical warfare, perception management, and strategic deception, along with such older terms as the war of ideas and the battle for hearts and minds and newer terms about weaponized social networks and weaponized narratives.” They say that we’re in a fragmented state of disarray in our potential evolution towards a Noosphere.

Current manifestations of a transfer towards a ‘global commons’ embrace the big-environmental-science circle (authorities, huge enterprise, banks, NGO’s), in addition to the social-activist civil-society targeted on commons-based peer manufacturing and new social contracts. We can see how big-science is engaged on coordinated collaboration efforts to deal with the world pandemic. Social-activist networks have created world actions like the school strike for climate. At least there are some constructive indicators of evolution.

Whose Story Wins?

The e-book focuses on US navy technique choices which isn’t stunning as it’s revealed by RAND. I cannot cowl these particulars right here as they don’t seem to be {of professional} curiosity, although I did discover these components informative. I’m keen on how the concepts on this e-book may affect sensemaking, collaboration, and knowledge-sharing in our organizations and societies. It comes down to at least one core concept.

Noopolitik is determined by realizing—and discovering new methods of realizing — about ideational, cognitive, and cultural issues that haven’t figured a lot in conventional statecraft.
As we now have at all times stated, noopolitik is in the end about whose story wins. Thus, the sorts of stories, or narratives, that matter in noopolitik should be fastidiously constructed to swimsuit the context. That narratives are essential for maneuvering in at the moment’s world is broadly accepted; however designing them stays extra of an artwork than a science, and there’s nonetheless loads of room for new concepts about tips on how to construct experience. —Ronfeldt & Arquilla

Stories are the key to influencing individuals, particularly on a big scale. I’ve mentioned a few of this already in mapping stories. Comprehension = “mapping your stories onto my stories”.


Source link

Load More Related Articles
Load More In Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *