Every fortnight I curate a number of the observations and insights that have been shared on social media. I name these Friday’s Finds.
Lyall Taylor — “Garry Kasparov once said that one of biggest mistakes chess players make is trying to ‘undo’ a bad move, when in reality, once a bad move is played, it is already a whole new game and an entirely fresh mindset is required.”
Peter Stoyko — “I think of sunk-cost as being too invested in a wrong path and reluctant to make a change of course. This is acknowledging a wrong change of course then trying to get back on the old path, which is no longer relevant because the course change sets up new strategic considerations.”
Gideon Rosenblatt —
“Untruth — lie
Double down — lie, repeated
Pivot — stopped mendacity
Tongue in cheek — realized that lie went too far”
Tim Minchin — “If somebody writes an article you disagree with, right here is an choice that lots of you appear to have forgotten: learn it, then have some ideas about it.
Then have some ideas about your ideas. Critically assess your intuitive response. Then see if there’s any parts of the piece that you just may agree with. See if it would even — god forbid – modify your view. Just a tiny bit.
Give to the author all of the credit score & generosity of interpretation you’ll give a pal. Apply to your self all of the criticism you’d intuitively direct at an enemy. Then wait a day. Perhaps learn the article once more.
Then, earlier than deciding to put up about it on twitter, take into account: am I signaling my advantage? Am I simply sharpening my model? Am I going to be inadvertently boosting the sign of one thing I want had much less publicity?
Am I simply fishing for ‘likes’. Do I’ve a method whereby I’d impact optimistic change? Is my interpretation distinctive sufficient so as to add to the controversy? Am I simply fueling ineffectual anger? Have I famous my biases? Have I utilized humility? Then suppose, possibly I’ll have a tea. Then go make a tea. Then drink your tea.”
“The saying ‘Jack of all trades, grasp of none’ is often used standalone in a form of slight in opposition to generalists as lesser than specialists.
But the unique full saying is sort of enlightening:
‘Jack of all trades, grasp of none, oftentimes higher than a grasp of 1.’”