Home Blog “we have moved to an era of post-ideology”

“we have moved to an era of post-ideology”

9 min read
Comments Off on “we have moved to an era of post-ideology”
2
269
countering populism

Every fortnight I curate some of the observations and insights that had been shared on social media. I name these Friday’s Finds.

@JohnRobb“Significant philanthropic activity is a good indicator that you live in a dysfunctional society.”

@White_Owly“It’s easy to criticise the system after you’ve made enough money from it to last a lifetime.”

@FearDept“In tomorrow’s digital society you will have no rights but the opportunity to earn many privileges.”

@CognitivePolicy “For everyone watching the political satire that has captured so much attention in recent years, ponder what happens when population pressure is too great — and inequality too severe — for any kind of prosocial behaviors to express at scale. You will see hints of worse to come.”

Now Any Government Can Buy China’s Tools for Censoring the Internet, through @GideonRo

U.S. officers concentrate on China’s skill to use its infrastructure investments in different nations to lengthen its spying capabilities. But the larger downside is that China is efficiently exporting to weak states the power to construct and maintain autocracy. That makes these nations unsafe for their very own folks, and the world much less secure for all of us. The U.S. response is so deeply primarily based in a hawkish, “new Cold War” stance that it might’t see that this isn’t a zero-sum sport between China and the U.S., however a battle for hearts and minds actually in all places else. While the U.S. is furiously locking China out of infrastructure and considering export bans on leading edge know-how like quantum computing, China is promoting not simply its equipment, not simply its companies, however its entire mannequin of “how to internet” to the remaining of the world. And the remaining of the world is shopping for it.

Thread by @AlexStubb former Prime Minister of Finland

“Thank you on your variety remarks concerning my earlier tweet about Finland’s new authorities composition. What strikes me is that many are ‘surprised’ that somebody from an ‘opposition party’ expresses constructive views about an ‘ideologically’ totally different authorities.

Perhaps it’s all about expectations. Somehow we predict that politics must be all about slamming those that will not be in our get together or have a special opinion a couple of particular problem. This is of course fed by politicians and the media. Spurred on by social media.

I discover this sort of pondering considerably quaint. Perhaps it’s as a result of I got here into politics slightly late. I joined my get together on the age of 36 and left government nationwide politics on the age of 49. While in workplace I usually felt uncomfortable with get together politics.

Yes, you possibly can name me naive. But for me the calling was at all times past the get together. It was primarily about values and getting issues carried out. The order was easy: values, nation, continent, world and get together. I additionally really feel strongly that we have moved to an era of post-ideology.

To simplify: fascism died in 1945; communism died in 1989; capitalism was rebooted in 2008; and democracy appears to be in transition since 2016. One means to put it: Ideology is useless, lengthy dwell identification! I’m not certain this can be a good factor, nevertheless it appears to be the pattern.

Technological improvements have made the world, no less than nearly, smaller. And what has been our response? A paradox. Instead of going international, many have gone native and native. Public discourse has develop into harsher. Tolerance of different opinions abysmal.

If that is the case, then we should always rethink the best way during which events and democratic establishments are run. The world is extra complicated. We don’t anymore vote on the idea of ideology. The focus is slightly on points and identification, typically one, usually many.

I believe that party-based bashing is counterproductive to constructive democratic discourse. It is simply the exhausting core get together trustworthy who appear to get kicks out of placing down different political events. Voters usually discover this kind of behaviour disagreeable, and rightly so.

The downside is that democracy is by definition gradual, messy and cumbersome. Today calls for on democracy, pushed by fashionable means of communication, are totally different. The tempo is quick. Decisions have to be made shortly. Time for reflection and compromise is restricted.

Yes, we have totally different opinions, however this doesn’t imply that democracy must be about bashing opponents. An excellent place to begin is to return to fundamentals: cordial and civil behaviour, respect for one another. So, with these phrases I would like to want the brand new authorities good luck.”




Source link

Load More Related Articles
Load More In Blog
Comments are closed.