Every fortnight I curate a few of the observations and insights that have been shared on social media. I name these Friday’s Finds.
“Leadership is a critical meddling within the lives of others. Managers/leaders with poor self-awareness and not understanding how their behaviour impacts employees don’t get the very best out of their groups.” —@shauncoffey
No matter how silly and powerless we’ve got been led to consider ourselves, we’ve got at our fingertips — in our pockets, even — entry to the near-totality of human information and capability.
It’s not too late to rise to this event. Omniscience requires good filtering. We might have gotten entry to each piece of actual and faux info ever produced however with out the flexibility to discriminate between them. We bought the intimacy of common connectivity however with out social abilities to navigate it. We bought good reminiscence however with out the required corresponding compassion for each other’s previous missteps and failures.
Much is made about Silicon Valley’s tradition of “innovation.” But the mannequin for startup enterprise financing, and the system of rewards driving this supposed innovation, isn’t artistic — it’s masturbatory. It wastes potential. It’s uninspired. It leaves founders like us staring on the ceiling.
The downside is that the platform Zuckerberg created does greater than “give people voice, and bring people together.” It is economically incentivized to drive folks aside. In the method it shatters an underpinning of democracy … Social media has, certainly, modified the best way folks create info. But platforms akin to Facebook have additionally modified how folks devour content material; company algorithms are actually the “centralized power” answerable for that consumption. Openness and transparency should come to social media. Targetcasting mustn’t destroy foundational parts of our democracy.
Empathy, due to this fact, is the human functionality of discovering the equivalence of 1’s inside self-model with that of its observations of the world. Empathy is how we make sense of the world. Conventionally, we make use of the phrase ‘understanding’ to this functionality. The origin of the phrase ‘understanding’ comes from the Latin prehendere, to know. Understanding means to know an thought, to carry on to an thought. The downside with this metaphor is that it fails to precise the notion that understanding of any new thought is feasible solely when it pertains to one’s personal inside psychological fashions. One can not grasp a brand new thought if one has not developed the cognitive roots to hold that concept on to that psychological tree. That is why you can’t obtain ‘symbol grounding’ in a top-down method.
So once we perceive concepts, we don’t seize and take concepts and separate them from their unique sources. It is extra like we empathize with what’s exterior. What this implies is that we don’t internalize the whole lot that’s exterior. We solely internalize the bits and items that we will connect to our present cognitive fashions. The the rest stays in exterior type. So once we look out into the world with our eyes, we don’t internalize the whole lot we see. We solely internalize what’s necessary to our self-models, the remaining we discard. We discard the remaining as a result of there are limits to our cognition and that our cognition may be very frugal. The key to understanding the distinctiveness of human cognition is knowing how we acknowledge what’s related and what will not be.