WASHINGTON — President Trump pushed the Australian prime minister throughout a latest phone name to assist Attorney General William P. Barr collect data for a Justice Department inquiry that Mr. Trump hopes will discredit the Mueller investigation, in accordance to two American officers with data of the decision.
The White House restricted entry to the decision’s transcript to a small group of the president’s aides, one of many officers mentioned, an uncommon determination that’s comparable to the dealing with of a July call with the Ukrainian president that’s on the coronary heart of House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into Mr. Trump. Like that decision, the dialogue with Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia exhibits the extent to which Mr. Trump sees the legal professional common as a important associate in his aim to present that the Mueller investigation had corrupt and partisan origins, and the extent that Mr. Trump sees the Justice Department inquiry as a possible means to achieve leverage over America’s closest allies.
And like the decision with the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, the dialogue with Mr. Morrison exhibits the president utilizing high-level diplomacy to advance his private political pursuits.
President Trump initiated the dialogue in latest weeks with Mr. Morrison explicitly for the aim of requesting Australia’s assist in the Justice Department assessment of the Russia investigation, in accordance to the 2 folks with data of the dialogue. Mr. Barr requested that Mr. Trump communicate to Mr. Morrison, one of many folks mentioned. It got here solely weeks after Mr. Trump appeared to make navy help to Ukraine contingent on Mr. Zelensky doing him the “favor” of serving to Mr. Barr along with his work.
A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to remark. A White House spokesman didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark, nor did a spokesperson for the Australian prime minister.
In making the request, Mr. Trump was in impact asking the Australian authorities to examine itself. The F.B.I.’s counterintelligence investigation into Russian interference within the 2016 election started after Australian officials told the bureau that the Russian authorities had made overtures to the Trump marketing campaign about releasing political damaging details about Hillary Clinton.
Australian officers shared that data after its high official in Britain met in London in May 2016 with George Papadopoulos, a Trump marketing campaign overseas coverage adviser who informed the Australian in regards to the Russian grime on Mrs. Clinton.
Mr. Papadopoulos additionally mentioned that he had heard that the Russians had “thousands” of Mrs. Clinton’s emails from Joseph Mifsud, an instructional. Mr. Mifsud, who was final seen working as a visiting professor in Rome, has disappeared. Trump allies, just like the president’s private lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani, have put forth an unsubstantiated declare that Western intelligence companies planted Mr. Mifsud to entice Mr. Papadopoulos.
Mr. Barr flew to Italy final week and met with Italian authorities officers on Friday. The Justice Department spokeswoman wouldn’t say whether or not he mentioned the election inquiry in these conferences, however former Justice Department officers mentioned that Mr. Barr would wish to ask overseas international locations for cooperation in turning over paperwork pertaining to the 2016 election.
Mr. Barr started a assessment of the Russia investigation this yr with the said aim of figuring out whether or not regulation enforcement or intelligence officers acted inappropriately of their determination throughout the peak of the 2016 presidential marketing campaign to start investigating whether or not the Trump marketing campaign was conspiring with Russia’s election interference. But the president has made no secret he sees a bigger objective: to validate his victory and to settle scores along with his perceived “deep state” enemies.
The Justice Department mentioned final week that it’s exploring the extent to which different international locations, together with Ukraine, “played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign.” At the very least, Mr. Barr has made it clear that he sees his work treading into delicate territory: how the regulation enforcement and intelligence companies of the United States’ closest allies share data with American officers.
Mr. Mueller’s investigation confirmed that Australia performed a central function within the origins of the unique F.B.I. investigation, even when his closing report doesn’t point out the nation by identify. It mentioned that data from a “foreign government” prompted the F.B.I. to “open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.”
But like a lot in regards to the pre-election interval, the episode has been the topic of a counternarrative marbled with conspiracy: that the Obama administration had dispatched the Australian official, Alexander Downer, to spy on the Trump marketing campaign as a part of a broader effort to assist Mrs. Clinton get elected.
There isn’t any proof to assist this, however the conspiracy has been superior by a number of the president’s allies in Congress, by some Fox News commentators, and in frequent tweets by Mr. Papadopoulos, who was sentenced final yr to two weeks in jail for lying to F.B.I. agents within the Russia inquiry who questioned him about any contacts between the Trump marketing campaign and Russian intermediaries.
Mr. Morrison, the Australian prime minister, met Mr. Trump in Washington this month for official conferences and a state dinner on the White House. Mr. Barr attended the dinner.
The legal professional common sparked an argument in April when he mentioned throughout congressional testimony that “spying” on the Trump marketing campaign had taken place as a part of the Russia investigation, and that there was a “failure among a group of leaders at the upper echelons” of the intelligence neighborhood. He later introduced that he was reviewing the origins of the Russia investigation, and President Trump mentioned, “I am so proud of our attorney general that he is looking into it.”
In May, Mr. Trump informed reporters that he needed his legal professional common to scrutinize the entire international locations that he believes conspired to injury his 2016 election hopes. He mentioned he hopes Mr. Barr “looks at the U.K., and I hope he looks at Australia, and I hope he looks at Ukraine. I hope he looks at everything, because there was a hoax that was perpetrated on our country.”
Mr. Barr appointed a profession prosecutor, John H. Durham, to lead the inquiry, however American officers mentioned that the legal professional common has taken an energetic function in overseeing Mr. Durham’s work. That has fueled issues that Mr. Trump has personally directed his legal professional common to micromanage a regulation enforcement inquiry to advance the president’s political agenda.
Justice Department officers have mentioned that it might be neither unlawful nor untoward for Mr. Trump to ask world leaders to cooperate with Mr. Barr. And it’s inside Mr. Barr’s powers to communicate with overseas regulation enforcement officers about what his prosecutor wants from them.
The president and his allies have been open about their view that Mr. Durham’s assessment is probably useful for the White House. Stephen Miller, a high adviser to Mr. Trump, mentioned on “Fox News Sunday” that the president initiated the July name with Mr. Zelensky partly to talk about “the collusion investigation that is inflicted so much pain and damage to our country,” and that “the attorney general has appointed somebody from the Justice Department to look into that issue.”
But individually on Sunday, the president’s first homeland safety adviser, Thomas P. Bossert, mentioned the idea that the Ukrainian authorities had intervened in 2016 on behalf of the Clinton marketing campaign had been “completely debunked.” Mr. Bossert mentioned on ABC’s “This Week” that he had relayed that to the president and was “deeply disturbed” that he pushed Mr. Zelensky to discover proof to assist the unsubstantiated accusation.
Mr. Trump has mentioned that he didn’t order Mr. Barr to conduct a assessment, however he did grant the legal professional common broad powers to declassify any intelligence concerned within the Russia investigation — a transfer that additionally primarily stripped the C.I.A. of its energy to select which nationwide safety data ought to stay secret.
Julian E. Barnes contributed reporting from Washington, and Maggie Haberman from New York.